You can purchase these applications on the Mac App Store."įinal Cut Pro 7 users who are interested in making the transition to the newer version are being directed to this page. "New versions of Apple pro video applications - including Final Cut Pro X, Motion 5, and Compressor 4 - are compatible with macOS High Sierra. "Older versions of Apple pro video applications - including applications in Final Cut Studio - will not launch on a computer running macOS High Sierra," reads the email.
According to cinema5D, Apple has started to notify Final Cut users about the change in an email that informs users that they'll need to upgrade to newer versions like Final Cut Pro X, Compressor 4 and Motion 5 ASAP.
If you don't update to the latest macOS, you might expose yourself to security risks if you do, you'll be forced to adapt your workflow to Final Cut Pro X, which many professionals are less fond of. This puts video editors who use FCP 7 in a rough spot. If they update Apple's upcoming operating system, existing Final Cut Pro 7 users who want to continue using Final Cut for video editing will be forced to transition to Final Cut Pro X. My first choice is always FCPX, without hesitation.Apple has revealed that its aging-but-beloved video editing program, Final Cut Pro 7, will not be supported by macOS High Sierra. When I start a project, however, the only reason I might use Premiere or FCP7 is if the client needs it. Personally, I have both Premiere and FCPX on my main computer, also have FCP7 available on another machine, and I consider myself proficient on all of them. I'm convinced that almost any editing task can be done quicker and easier on FCPX than the others, but it's a major change and requires a lot of re-learning for an editor to master. That does not mean, however, that it can't have better and more efficient workflow. It does not fit well with industry-standard workflows. Unlike Avid and Premiere, however, it is optimized for a single editor and not a collaborative environment. Now in version 10.3.4, FPCX is very deep, faster than anything else, and at least as capable. With FCPX Apple tried to design a better editing paradigm and I think they succeeded, but unfortunately they introduced it to the market before it was ready. Now I prefer FCPX, mostly because it applies available technology to the process better than the others. I've worked professionally as an editor for many years, and have used Avid, Premiere and FCP almost from version 1. I hate that FCPXs reputation is so bad, but I'm finding that the people who think it's bad have never actually used it and only know about details from its terrible launch.Ībsolutely. The XML transfers between FCPX and Resolve have been flawless for me so far with no information being lost and everything lining back up when I bring it back into FCPX. But Resolve is free, so I just roundtrip since Resolve is fantastic. When it comes to color, FCPXs tool is decent for primaries, but they hugely limit themselves in secondaries since you can't apply a custom shape mask to a secondary correction (just an ellipse or a rectangle). There are still some things FCPX sucks at, like you can't put an ease in/out on keyframed scale movements (key framing in general could be better), but you can overcome that by using the Ken Burns tool and some clever thinking. I see a lot of people here mentioning Premiere is great because of Dynamic Link with After Effects, but I often found it was actually costing me time since it would lead to more rendering time within Premiere rather than outputting a file once out of After Effects and slapping it on the timeline. Magnetic timeline, while frustrating as shit at first, is an absolute massive time saver once you get the hang of it. Keywords are a far faster way to organize footage than bins. I find FCPX to generally just be better and more efficient in every way, especially with the introduction of audio lanes. I freelance and had been switching between Premiere and FCPX between the couple of clients I have, but I recently reintroduced FCPX to the Premiere client and got him to switch his workflow over after a few weeks.